Ekalavya - The Guru Drohi

By Sri Chiraan 2009/05/07

Ninth lord if in mruduswabhava rasi or in aspect or association of Jupiter, the native will have Gurubhakti. If associated with malefics the native will go against Guru. 

Ninth lord in navasmsa if placed well, the navamsa lord if aspected by Jupiter, the person will be endowed with guru bhakti, if afflicted the person will offend his preceptors.

• Ekalavya is known for the Guru bhakti in the popular history.
• His story has been celebrated as cruelty on part of Guru Dronacharya.
• Also Ekalavya has been portrayed as that of being a victim to the partiality of Acharya Drona, for his love towards Arjun.
• Ekalavya is supposed to have learnt everything all by himself.
• Ekalvya is portrayed as one from lower caste and untouchable.
• Ekalavya is seen as another victim of Pandav favouritism, just like Karna.
• Incidentally Ekalavya is brother-in law of Karna.

Contrary to the above popular belief let me give you the real facts to uncover the myth about EKALAVYA.

Before venturing into the character named Ekalavya, it is important to know the greatness of Acharya Drona.

Dronacharya was a man without desires, he used to live on shillonch vrutti [that which prohibits one to ask anything from anyone].

• He was taught astra Vidya By Lord Parshurama [not different from Krishna].
• He was very devoted to Lord and his Guru.
• He was true to his profession of teaching and to his employers, and kept his words always.
• Arjuna had promised to carry his mission [to conquer Drupad], and thus HE had promised Arjun to make him the greatest Archer.
• Archery consists of plain skill of holding bow and relieving arrows + knowledge of astras [missiles].
• Without knowledge of missiles plain archery is of limited use.
• Astras involve usage of Vedic techniques. [These can be learnt only from Guru].

Drona was divine personality, his grace would make anyone a great. Now let us move to Ekalavya.

• Ekalavya was not a lower caste, he was nishada prince [a son of nishad king].
• Nishada is a caste sprung from the intermixing of Bramhins and Sudras[parasava + kshatra]. These are tribes that dwell in forests and are adept in various skills from hunting to boating. They form an important part of forest life and governance in general, as they are chieftains over which a kingdom stands.
• Ekalavya and his father etc were in the service of Kashi raja.

Ekalavya went to Drona to learn Vidya Why?

• Ekalavya had a inherent hate towards Lord Krishna.
• Ekalavya was the incarnation of demon Manimanta.
• He had gone into deep forest to learn astras from Pisachas. [Paisaach vidya and paisaach astras].
• He had used them against Krishna, but could not succeed, thus he understood that he should acquire Deva astras.
• Only Guru Drona could impart such Knowledge.
• Thus he Approached Drona.

Why did Drona reject Ekalavya?

• Drona knew he was inherently a hater of Lord Sri Krishna. [His Guru not different from Parashurama].
• Entertaining him would be to go against his Guru.
• Secondly By then Guru Drona was in the service of teaching Princes of Hastinapur.
• School where Princes are taught, ordinary citizens are not allowed to learn by their side.
• Only Royals and Brahmins in Royal service could enrol themselves in such schools.
• This is the reason why even Karna was rejected.
• Those were the days when Governance itself was based on a caste.
• Hence an outcaste could not have dared to go to a Bramhin. [A Royal service men in the service of Monarch of the world] to teach him if it were against rules. So Ekalavya was not an outcaste. neither a low born because astra vidya could be taught to only higher caste warriors.

Disappointed Ekalavya went to the forest, prepared a IDOL of Dronacharya and started practising the archery.

• This gave him profound mastery in archery.
• This is not the greatness of Ekalavya, but greatness of Dronacharya himself, that even worshipping his idol too gave extraordinary brilliance in the vidya. If this was not so, then Ekalavya could have practised all by himself without the idol. But he knew the greatness of Drona, and thus resorted to this form of practise.
• This shows extreme determination of Ekalvya to gain the vidya [determination to kill Krishna].
• But all daitya [rakshasas, demons] are known to have done tapasya earlier, and gained boons from Shiva and others, this is just another example of Ekalavya doing tapasya to Dronacharya.

Dronacharya asked his right thumb

• When in the forest, royal dog was stopped from barking by Ekalavya [without hurting the dog, Ekalavya had gagged the dog with the arrows].
• This created a concern in the mind of Arjun and asked whether Drona was true to his words.
• Drona to keep his words and to prevent Ekalavya from going against his guru [Lord] and principles, asked for his right Thumb as Gurudakshina.

Ekalavya cut off his thumb

• Because, he knew refusing Gurudaksina would render his Vidya useless [just as Karna had suffered]. Thus it is better to give up the thumb rather than risking curse.
• Dronacharya was divine from the fact that he restored The THUMB equivalent to Arjun in plain archery and less stiff when using astras .
• This way Acharya Drona fulfilled his words and also kept his duty .

Later on the mount Raivat Dronacharya taught Astra Vidyas to Ekalavya. Equipped with the Astra Vidya. 

• Ekalavya along with Paundraka Vaasudeva [another son of Vasudev from the diti] attacked Dwaraka in the night.
• Krishna had gone to Kailash to beget a son.
• Satyaki and Balaraam along with the army fought with the Ekalavya and Paundraka Vaasudeva their army with lamps.
• Ekalavya and others extinguished all the lamps.
• So Balaraam went to back to bring additional Lamps.
• Satyaki kept at bay both Ekalvya and Paundraka.
• Just then Krishna returned, he cut all the weapons of Ekalavya and Paundraka and destroyed their chariots.
• Balaraam then happy at the return of Krishna, with full vigour raised his musal and attacked Ekalavya.
• Ekalvya afraid of furious Balraam, started running away.
• He ran and fell in the ocean.
• Balaram stood near the banks, but Ekalavya fearing and assuming Balraam is chasing, swam 80 yojanas and reached an island. There he looked back and seeing Balraam at the banks relieved a sigh.
• Then Ekalavya underwent tapasya to Shiva to get the boon of being defeat-less and ever victorious.
• Shiva granted him the boon.
• Now with much more pride and strength Ekalavya attacked Krishna again, and used all the astras given by Drona and Shiva. But Krishna cut all the astras and finally with his Sudarshan cut his head off .

Story of Ekalavya is the portrayal of greatness of Dronacharya, as how when in dilemma a man should act and yet uphold the Dharma, and duty towards society, king, Guru and pupils and finally towards GOD.

Guru bhakti is not in showing histrionics before GURU. Guru bhakti is in total surrender to teacher, obeying his every word, upholding his every value and treading the path shown by him. Ekalavya only showed histrionics and acted contrarily to his guru’s views, loyalties and culture and principles. This is GURU DROHA, thus  finally he achieved nothing and met with death at a young age at the hands of Lord SRIKRISHNA.

Krishnarpanamastu

Shivapalit vs Vishnupalit [A study]

By Sri Chiraan 2009/04/20

Once a great astrologer came up with a great concept that, the world is divided into two types of people.

• Shivapalit jataka
• Vishnu Palitha jataka

1. The learned man’s contention was that Sun, Moon, Mars, Jupiter, form one group [Vishnu palitha].
2. And Venus Mercury and Saturn fall in another group [Shiva Palitha].
3. Lagnas belonging to Leo, Cancer, Pisces, Sagittarius, Scorpio and Aries are Vishnu Palita.
4. Lagnas belonging to Gemini, Virgo, Taurus, Libra, Aquarius, Capricorn come under Shiva Palita.
5. Shiva Palita are blessed with ample wealth luxuries, and are inclined to material world and happiness and pray Lord Shiva, Parvati, Shakti, Bhairav etc.
6. Vishnu Palita jatakas are into gyana bhakti vairagya, intellectual pursuits, struggling and poor.
7. If Shiva Palita is suffering and wants come out of his sufferings, he must resort to Shaiva pooja, only then he will get riches and fame, however hard he tries to please Vishnu and other linked Deities he would never get results. So such people if they want riches and fame they should appease non Vaishnav deities.
8. Similarly If Vishnu Palit Jataka are into sufferings due to prarabdha, if by any chance these are visiting Shakti temples or Shiva Kshetras, these will never be rewarded with results instead their sufferings will increase. But on the contrary if they resort to Vishnu aradhana, they will prosper instantly.
9. Shiva Palita jatakas have chakras rising from mooladhara to Sahasrar.
10. Vishnu Palita jataka has flow of chakras [energy] from Sahasrar to Moolesha.

It was an interesting research although, but I did not find any supportive testimony to accept it, neither did the gentleman tried to give one. But he was so firm in his belief, that just at a look at the horoscope, he would ask the people to discontinue their Vishnu aradhana or Shiva Aradhana.

• His belief fortified when a person serving in Mantralayam with Vishnu mantra japa for 12 years could not get success and went to this astrologer, he said you are Mithuna lagna Rayaru will not listen to you, you must resort to Panchakshari. He accepted his words and suddenly next year he accomplished his desire, and thanked the astrologer and went away to his native.
• Second came a Vedanti he was practising intense Yoga, but could not enter the Sahasrar for as many as five years. He could not enter sahasrar and his energies would lapse back into mooladhar as he forced his way to Sahasrar. The astrologer said, you are Vishnu palita your mode of practise is wrong, go perform Hanuman seva for 48 days, you will enter Sahasrar . He agreed and then he was successful .
• All these and several other cases made him believe intensely in the theory.

• So I thought to give it a study .
• The basis would render a simple division of humanity into two parts, just on the basis of Lagna .
  • Not acceptable as there are many Vishnu bhaktas with lagna in Mithuna or Vrishabha, or Kumbha, and they are intensely devotional. Although they may not be completely detached .
• Secondly what about those whose Shaiva lagnas are aspected by Vishnu palita grahas, and vice versa
  • We do not get any explanation, as this should render people to resort to both upasanas .
• The research can be more termed as success in Upasanas of a person
  • No text attributes upasana to lagna
  • Upasana is studied from fifth house, twelfth house
  • Upasana is studied from Amatya karaka 
  • Also from fifth from Atma karaka 
  • Upasana is also studied from Vimsamsa and chaturvimsamsa
• The research can also be termed as teaming of deva paksha with Rakshas paksha, Jupiter as Dev Guru and and Shukra as Daitya guru.
  • Here too Planets friendly with Jupiter are termed as Dev and Venus group is malefic.
  • Malefics in Puranas are known to resort to Shiva and never to Vishnu.
  • But attaining this distinction on mere Lagna ownership cannot be justified, because that would render all malefic owned Lagnas ineffective for VIshnu Bhakti and vice versa.
  • This research makes sense, but where to draw distinction is only difficult but definitely lagna in rashi cannot form such distinction.
  • Let us examine some alternates.
• The Navamsa in the horoscope is divided into Dev, Manushya and Rakshasa category
  • But I have found most devoted also coming under the Rakshsas category in Navamsa.
  • So Navamsa while can say which root the soul belongs to, but cannot declare him to be anti shiva or anti vaishnav. As Prahlad being Rakshasa was a known Vishnu devotee. Jayant a devta has gone against Ram.
• The drekkana gives three distinction of Narada, Agastya and Doorvasa, denoting, bhakti yoga, gnyana yoga and karma yoga.
  • Here distinction of Shiva and Vishnu palita cannot be achieved by mere means of  sadhana.
• The Akshavedaamsa gives the distinction of jataka on the basis of Vishnu, Shiva and Bramha.
  • But all Shaiva bhaktas did not show their lagna falling under Shiva.
  • Nor did Vishnu Bhaktas have their lagnas falling under Vishnu amsa.
  • Bramha amsa is an addition here.
  • By far this is the closest in accepting the theory, but theory need modification, and has to take into account the fact that humanity can be divided into:
    • Vishnu palit
    • Bramha Palit
    • Shiva Palit
  • But the onus of distinction should lie with choosing one among the Lagna, Sun [atma], Moon, Atma karaka, And other special lagna. The one with most strength.
• Finally Parashar muni says there are four types of people based on lagna: Uttama, Madhyam, Adhama and Udaseena.
  • This is based on planets in udayarashi.
  • Shodashamsa divides lagna into Bramha, Vishnu, Shiva and Surya amsha.
  • Shodashamsha is more concerned with happiness of the people.
• The learned should take this as just a study and not as conclusive or affirmative.

Krishnarpanamastu